As Salam Wale Kum,
I totally agree that there is only one Book for Islam and that is Al-Quran.
There is only One God (Allah) and his messenger is Rasool Allah (SAW).
If any other book just reflects the meaning of Al-Quran in same understanding as it is then i think Islam can accept the book and can have it for reference for our brothers & sisters who are not able to understand Al-Quran or for those non-muslims brothers and sisters.
I love my Rasool (SAW) more than my life, if i hear anything from anybody or read anything for any book i get really touched by that. This is just becoz of my love to my Allah and Rasool (SAW).
If anyone doing any injustice with Al-Quran and play with my feelings or the feelings of muslims and islam then he is Satan.
Books of Islam is to spread Islam and knowledge not to create your own Islam.
Thanks / Regards
Shakeel Ahmed
Shakeel Ahmed
Here is the test to find whether your mission on Earth is finished: if you're alive, it isn't. -- Richard Bach
From: Muhammad Jhangir <jhangirmd@ymail.com>
To: Irshad Mahmood <irshad2000@gmail.com>; TARIQ KHAN <tariqkhanteekay@hotmail.com>
Cc: OZAIR KHAN <oak.gis@gmail.com>; Owais Khan <obbi@hotmail.com>; Riazuddin Ahmed <riazsaskatch@yahoo.ca>; HUMNA <humnasultan@hotmail.com>; "iqbalsheikh@hotmail.com" <iqbalsheikh@hotmail.com>; Sabahuddin Qazi <sabahuddinqazi@gmail.com>; "tahirakhan@comcast.net" <tahirakhan@comcast.net>; "sydsadr@hotmail.com" <sydsadr@hotmail.com>; "sabahatca@hotmail.com" <sabahatca@hotmail.com>; "latif.m.chaudhery@gmail.com" <latif.m.chaudhery@gmail.com>; "khshaikh1999@gmail.com" <khshaikh1999@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 4:46 PM
Subject: «*» RUKHSANA«*» How to evaluate what is Gallath and Sahee Bukhari....?
To: Irshad Mahmood <irshad2000@gmail.com>; TARIQ KHAN <tariqkhanteekay@hotmail.com>
Cc: OZAIR KHAN <oak.gis@gmail.com>; Owais Khan <obbi@hotmail.com>; Riazuddin Ahmed <riazsaskatch@yahoo.ca>; HUMNA <humnasultan@hotmail.com>; "iqbalsheikh@hotmail.com" <iqbalsheikh@hotmail.com>; Sabahuddin Qazi <sabahuddinqazi@gmail.com>; "tahirakhan@comcast.net" <tahirakhan@comcast.net>; "sydsadr@hotmail.com" <sydsadr@hotmail.com>; "sabahatca@hotmail.com" <sabahatca@hotmail.com>; "latif.m.chaudhery@gmail.com" <latif.m.chaudhery@gmail.com>; "khshaikh1999@gmail.com" <khshaikh1999@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 4:46 PM
Subject: «*» RUKHSANA«*» How to evaluate what is Gallath and Sahee Bukhari....?
السلامُ علیکُم ورحمتُہ وبرکاتُہ
One of the Muslim Brother asked How to evaluate what is Gallath and Sahee Bukhari....?
My Reply :-
Bukhari is nothing but a similar mythological ethic of Ramayana. There is no distinctions in these books. The only difference matters is Ravan Hijacked Sita and Bukhari attempted to Hijack Islam. Bottom line both Ravan and Bukhari failed to achieve there passionate desires.
There is only one and only one Hadith of Allah, that is AL-Quran.
Questions like Who edited Sahee Bukhari...?
In Which Era Gallat Bukari was Eluded....?
Instead of following Strictly Quran, research on all this stuff type of questions is a foolish act.
We all knew Book of Ramayana is nothing to do with Islam. Similarly Bukhari and his Sahee or Gallath stuff has nothing to do with Islam.
Islam was completed in the ERA of Muhammad (Pbuh).
Most popular Concept of Claiming Quran as primary source and taking Bukhari as second source literally reflects the progeny act of Ahele Khitab.
Some say they are ready to quit the Gallat Weak Hadith of Bukhari, then what is harm in following those Hadiths which are neither contradicting nor supporting Quran as they implies a good moral.
My Answer to them is there are millions of Books in the market which speaks about the creator and reflects a cute moral meaning in the end of the lesson. but we are not considering those books as part of Islam. Similarly where is the scope of following the Book of Bhukari Hadiths if it gives some good moral meaning of not contradicting nor supporting Quran.
In the view of Allah there is neither any Primary Source nor any Secondary source of Islam.
In Chapter Anam = 6 Verse = 114 Rasool (Muhammad SAW)] asked a question:-
6:114 "Shall I seek a judge other than Allâh while it is He Who has sent down unto you the Book (The Qur'ân), Explained in Detail."
To follow complete Islam there is only one and only one Source that is AlQuran
Hence forth it doesn't require any Mudathihoon to distinguish between what is Sahee and What is Gallath.
If any one has written any thing except Quran as a part of Islam then it is Gallat.
Al-Hamdulliah we have 100% Islam in the form of Quran with a secured surplus lock on it. So we don't need 110% Islam with the help of Sahee or Gallat shadow research of Mudhathihoon on the books of Bukhari.
Sign Personality of Last Prophet is discussed in Hindu Scripture Vedas also, but we are not following those books.
Similarly if Muhammad (A.S) is discussed in Bukari then from where does it mean that it is compulsory to follow Bukhari ..?
Book of Allah did not say Quran is not enough or self-sufficient to follow complete Islam of Allah.
Neither Ramayana nor Book of Bukhari said Quran alone is not self-sufficient to follow complete Islam of Allah.
When Quran did not command to follow the sunnah of Rasool rather it strongly commands to follow the sunnah of Allah, then why Sahee and Gallat Bukhari are intruded as a part of Islam..?
If you are a follower of Quran then start pro-founding on below verses:
16:89....We have sent down to you the Book (the Qur'an) as an Exposition of Everything, a guidance, a mercy, and glad tidings for those who have submitted themselves
29:51. Is it not sufficient for them that We have sent down to you the Book (the Qur'ân) which is recited to them.
41:3. A Book whereof the Verses are Explained in Detail.
If you are a follower of Bukari Muslim then check whether the below Muslim Hadith is helpful to you or not.
Muslim: Book 42 Hadith 7147:-
Abu Sa'id Khudri reported that Allah's Messenger (May peace be upon him) said:
Do not Take Down Anything from Me. and he who took down anything from me except the Qur'an, he should efface (Delete) that, and narrate from me, for there is no harm in it and he who attributed any falsehood to me-and me-and Hammam said: I think he also said:" deliberately" -he should in fact find his abode in the Hell-Fire.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:10 PM, TARIQ KHAN <tariqkhanteekay@hotmail.com> wrote:
I am in serious search for the GHALLAT BUKHARI and the name/s of those who edited the Sahee Bukhari. Wish also to learn how we can claim that the present Bukhari is Shaee or wrong... any witness. Request please assist in my quest.....Tariq Khan.
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:54:08 -0800
From: jhangirmd@ymail.com
Subject: {GRP} Bukhari :: Book 5 :: Volume 57 :: Hadith 57
To: multiculturalism-pluralismgroup@yahoogroups.com
CC: tahirakhan@comcast.net; sydsadr@hotmail.com; sabahatca@hotmail.com; latif.m.chaudhery@gmail.com; khshaikh1999@gmail.com
The ideology of editing divine books was already active from the times of Musa (A.S) and Isaa (A.S) Era.In terms of Muhammad (A.S) Era, Surplus lock on the book by ALLAH Karim defended their desired protocol mission of amendments in editing Noble Quran. It was a shocking surprise to Satan to which he was not ready for this comprise.He came back in to a improved fold when Prophet, 4 Calipha and all of his companions were demised, there was no one left to verify any teachings which were based on Rasool sermon and decided to have separate books of Ahadeeth on account narrations as Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmizi, Abu Dawood, Ibn Majaa with repeated Hadiths and labeled them as Rasool preachings and defended the same by showing the chain link companion of Abu Hurrairah.Later all these books became encyclopaedia similar to Bible, old testaments and new testaments like progeny of Ahele Kitaab.Over more than 100 books were easily transmitted among the generation against Quran, in the shadow name of ALLAH & Rasoolullah his SahabaOne can easily Imagine if Quraan was not locked, we would have dozens of versions of Sahi Quran and Dai'f Quran in a huge numbers.From: Faiz <tahirakhan@comcast.net>
To: JAX_Muslims@yahoogroups.com; multiculturalism-pluralismgroup@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: [JAX_Muslims] Bukhari :: Book 5 :: Volume 57 :: Hadith 57<<< Abu Hurairah's total number of narrations exceeds more than all of the 4 caliphs combined!>>>Actually, the combined number of hadith ascribed to the caliphs are FAR LESS than Abu Hurayrah's! This is despite the fact all of these caliph were LIFE-LONG companions of the Prophet (pbuh). This is the main reason Muslims should be seriously thinking about—this will help them in quitting hashish (sorry, I mean hadith). Hadith writing is a HUGE hole of falsehood and fabrication that followed AFTER the righteous caliphs departed. The righteous caliphs never arranged ANY hadith to be written or documented—rather they seemed to have made sure that all that written stuff is destroyed. They knew it would be a fitanah for Muslims.<<< I ate no leavened bread and dressed no decorated striped clothes, and never did a man or a woman serve me, >>>According to "Islamic history" (whatever that means), Hadhrat Umar FIRED Abu Hurayrah from the governorship of Bahrain on charges of 'getting rich' in short period of time. If the 'Asma-ur-Rijaal' science is what it claims, Abu Hurayra should not have passed the stringency test of truthfulness---but apparently he did (somehow it reminds me of Zardari). Talk about corruption in compiling of hadith folklore!IrfanFrom: JAX_Muslims@yahoogroups.com [mailto:JAX_Muslims@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Muhammad Jhangir
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 5:08 AM
To: multiculturalism-pluralismgroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [JAX_Muslims] Bukhari :: Book 5 :: Volume 57 :: Hadith 57السلامُ علیکُم ورحمتُہ وبرکاتُہIn Sahih Al-Bukhari, we have more than a thousand hadiths by a figure named Abu Hurairah. Abu Hurairah was an alleged companion of the Prophet, whose narrations of hadith numbered 5374 in authentic collections, thus making him the most quoted of all the hadith narrators.This number seems strange due to the fact that Abu Hurairah spent less than three years with the Prophet. The people who spent the most time with him narrated significantly less hadith. Abu Hurairah's total number of narrations exceeds more than all of the 4 caliphs combined!However, this essay is concerned with a particular hadith. This hadith is in Sahih Al-Bukhari itself and so has been deemed authentic by the majority of the Muslims. Yet, this hadith fatally renders both Abu Hurairah and Al-Bukhari himself as fundamentally untrustworthy:Bukhari :: Book 5 :: Volume 57 :: Hadith 57The people used to say, "Abu hurairah narrates too many narrations." In fact I used to keep close to Allah's Apostle and was satisfied with what filled my stomach. I ate no leavened bread and dressed no decorated striped clothes, and never did a man or a woman serve me, and I often used to press my belly against gravel because of hunger, and I used to ask a man to recite a quranic Verse to me although I knew it, so that he would take me to his home and feed me. And the most generous of all the people to the poor was Ja'far bin Abi Talib. He used to take us to his home and offer us what was available therein. He would even offer us an empty folded leather container (of butter) which we would split and lick whatever was in it.Our sympathy should be given to this man who had to go hungry so often. However, this particular bit should be analysed carefully =:-'I used to ask a man to recite a quranic Verse to me although I knew it, so that he would take me to his home and feed me'There are a few questions we need to ask here. In Al-Madeenah, where the sahaba were in governance along with the Prophet, they couldn't help Abu Hurairah out?The Quran tells us that they were so close that even you spend all that is on earth, you cannot produce that closeness (8 Anfal 63) but Abu Hurairah was left hungry.Next, what was Abu Hurairah doing using the Quran to feed himself like that?Didn't he know that this is a wrong thing to do? Even if the other sahabah didn't notice, couldn't he ask them?If they were meant to be close. Couldn't he ask the others for work instead of misusing the Quran as he did?And what of Al-Bukhari? According to legend, Bukhari rejected a narrator because the narrator used some trick on his donkey to get the donkey to come to him. This is how stringent Bukhari was but when it came to Abu Hurairah, he accepted more than a thousand of his hadith.There is simply no defence for this. This flaw has rendered both Bukhari and Abu Hurairah untrustworthy.JhangirModerator
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mission of Global-Right-Path is to Educate Muslim Ummah in the light of the Quraan and Authentic Hadeeth, to face all the internal and external challenges, as well as to become a Great Revolutionized Leader to work for Global Revolution to serve the humanity in a balanced way to stabilize the Global World.
http://global-right-path.net16.net
.
Spiritual Doctors are Treating Spiritual Patients, so Please be Patience.
Change yourself according to the Quraan, NOT reverse.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Global-Right-Path" group.
To post to this group, send email to
global-right-path@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
global-right-path+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ca/group/global-right-path
http://global-right-path.net16.net
__._,_.___
VISIT RUKHSANA FM ONLINE RADIO
http://www.freewebs.com/rukhsanafm
http://www.freewebs.com/rukhsanafm
http://www.freewebs.com/rukhsanafm
http://magicsgifs.blogspot.com
http://magicsgifs.blogspot.com
http://magicsgifs.blogspot.com
***********************************
Enjoy your stay at Rukhsana Group.
Moderators Rukhsana Group:
Aika Rani,Sitara Ansari, Lilly ,A k h t a r,Mumtaz Ali
Contact us at: llolli_bobby@yahoo.com
Aika_Rani@Yahoo.Com
akhtar_khatri2001@yahoo.com
Rukhsana-owner@yahoogroups.com
**********************************
.
__,_._,___
.jpg)
0 comments:
Post a Comment